Showing posts with label CJ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CJ. Show all posts

Qazi Anwar returns Babar Awan’s Rs1 million cheque


President Supreme Court Bar Association Qazi Anwar. — Photo by APP
ISLAMABAD: President Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) Qazi Anwar on Tuesday returned a cheque, worth Rs1 million, earlier given to the association by Law Minister Babar Awan.
Speaking to media representatives outside the court, Anwar said accepting such an amount was creating doubts about his integrity.
He said Awan had offered him a cheque bearing Rs1 million for the welfare of the Supreme Court employees.
Qazi Anwar said a faction of the media had started a defamation campaign against him, and he had decided to return the cheque for this reason.
He then disposed off the cheque in front of media representatives.
Sources

LHC reserves verdict on NAB chairman’s appointment


The court has reserved the verdict to determine whether the case requires a hearing. –File Photo
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court reserved its verdict on the petition against Retired Supreme Court Justice Deedar Hussain Shah’s appointment as Chairman of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).The court has reserved the verdict to determine whether the case requires a hearing.
The petitioner Javed Iqbal Jaffery claimed that he is more qualified than Deedar Hussain Shah for this post.
Jaffery further said that he has been practicing law since 53 years.
The petitioner maintained his earlier stance that the NAB Chairman’s appointment had been made on political grounds.
During the tenure of Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto, the appointment of police inspectors were made by taking two to four lac rupees and the practice still continues, Jaffery said. 

Govt cannot withdraw reinstatement notification: SC


Supreme Court of Pakistan. — Photo by AP
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Friday issued a “restraining order”, instructing the top functionaries of the government against taking any action to revoke the earlier notification about restoration of members of the superior judiciary.
The order by the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, was issued after an extra-ordinary hearing by a 17-member larger bench to review the news about any such government move, and after not receiving any satisfactory response from Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani in this regard.
The “restraining order” was nothing short of a stern warning by the country’s highest court, as it declared that dismissing any judge through an executive order will not only be unconstitutional, it will be in violation of the Supreme Court’s judgement of July 31, and will amount to subversion of the Constitution, and an act of high treason.
The Chief Justice also issued instructions that the latest order be immediately dispatched to all functionaries of the government, suggesting that the President, Prime Minister and all top officials dealing with such issues be made aware of the consequences of any attempt to undermine the superior judiciary.
Earlier during the hearing on Friday morning the judges of the apex court expressed their serious concerns on the reports of a possible move by the government to withdraw the notification through which judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, who were dismissed by General Pervez Musharraf, were restored.
Even though the Attorney-General repeatedly informed the apex court judges that no such move was being contemplated by the government, and the hype was unnecessarily created by a section of the media, the Chief Justice asked for a written assurance by the Prime Minister. When the court reassembled after the break, it was informed by the Attorney-General that the Prime Minister was not available but the message had been conveyed to him through his staff. On that the judges expressed their extreme annoyance, prompting them to issue the “restraining order”.
The government was also asked through this order to come up with a satisfactory reply by October 18.
The high-drama revolving round the possible government move started late last night with a couple of television channels broadcasting news that Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani was planning to revoke the earlier notification. And even though Prime Minister Gilani and Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira had denied such reports, the apex court judges assembled in the court in the night, and in a post-midnight decision, set up a larger bench of 17 judges to take up the matter on Friday.
Sources

Move termed violation of NRO verdict: SC


“Will NRO judgment by 17 judges prevail or of the three-member bench in the prosecutor’s case?” the chief justice asked. – File Photo
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court pointed out to the government ‘in guarded language’ on Wednesday that its appointment of Justice (retd) Deedar Hussain Shah as chairman of the National Accountability Bureau was another violation of the court verdict on the National Reconciliation Ordinance because it had been done without consultation with the chief justice.

“In guarded and careful language we are bringing to your notice that prima facie this is another non-adherence of paragraph 180 of the Dec 16, 2009, judgment and paragraph 288 of the Asfandyar Wali case,” observed Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, the head of a 17-judge full court hearing a government’s review petition against its verdict holding the NRO illegal and implementation of the NRO judgment.

The observation upset Attorney General Maulvi Anwarul Haq who only cited a prosecutor general’s case during which a similar discussion had taken place, without a verdict.

“Will NRO judgment by 17 judges prevail or of the three-member bench in the prosecutor’s case?” the chief justice asked. “A person of your stature should not have said so.”

CJP used fake domicile certificate, alleges Jatoi



QUETTA: The ruling quarters came under fire on Saturday when Federal Minister for Defense Production Abdul Qayyum Jatoi hurled allegations against Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, ARY NEWS reports.

Jatio alleged that the CJP had a fake domicile certificate.

“Mr Chaudhry belongs to Faisalabad but he used the domicile of Balochistan to become a judge,” Jatio blamed while addressing a news conference after meeting Nawabzada Talal Akbar Bugti, Chief of Jamhoori Watan Party (JWP) and son of Nawab Akbar Bugti.

He said ‘corruption is right of everyone’. "There should be equality in corruption. All should be given their due share."

NRO beneficiaries to be sacked: Gilani




“In the game of chess, when the game is over, the kings and pawns are put in the same box,” Prime Minister Gilani. -File Photo
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said on Sunday that rewriting or amending the Constitution was the sole prerogative of parliament and not of the Supreme Court.
Talking to senior journalists and television anchorpersons, he said in what appeared to be a shift from his earlier position that he would sack all beneficiaries of the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) when a list now being vetted by the law ministry was submitted to him.
He said a five-point summary signed by him would be submitted to the Supreme Court on Monday.
The prime minister said he would hold a meeting with Chief of the Army Staff Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani at around 2pm to exchange views on the political situation.

Seventy NRO beneficiaries to face the axe


The law ministry has sent a list of around 70 NRO beneficiaries to PM Gilani.—File photo
The law ministry has sent a list of around 70 NRO beneficiaries to PM Gilani.—File photo
ISLAMABAD: In a late-night development, a group of journalists were invited to the Prime Minister’s House at short notice. 
Having gathered there at about ten on Sunday night, they were told that a list of NRO beneficiaries would be released. However, an hour later they were informed that the list would not be released.

Sources in the Prime Minister’s House revealed that the government was likely to take the difficult but pragmatic decision of shedding the NRO beneficiaries working in different positions. 

SC hears petitions challenging 18th Amendment


Supreme Court of Pakistan. — Photo by AP
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Monday was hearing petitions challenging the 18th Amendment.
A 17-judge full court was hearing the petitions challenging certain clauses in the amendment.
During the hearing, Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry said opening the Objectives Resolution’s Pandora’s box was not necessary.
He further said that the Supreme Court has made obvious the constitution's fundamental features through its decisions.
“The constitution represents 180 million people of Pakistan…any legislation in conflict with the constitution cannot be a law,” Chief Justice Iftikhar said.
Judiciary is neither a part of the government, nor is it the government’s subordinate, he said.

Chief Justice to greet Musharraf on return: PM



MULTAN: Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani has said that if former president Pervez Musharraf returns to the country he will be received by the chief justice because a lot of cases have been lodged against him. 

Talking to journalists here on Monday after meeting PML-N leader Javed Hashmi and inquiring after his health, he said political forces would not allow derailing of democracy. He said both PPP and PML-N had offered a lot of sacrifices for democracy. 

“We are in favour of democracy and Nawaz Sharif also supports democracy.” 

The prime minister said there was no threat to democracy in the presence of a powerful Constitution. 

He said donations of over Rs4 billion had been made to the Prime Minister’s Flood Relief Fund and the government would pay Rs100,000 to each affected family. 

He said the government had asked the provinces to hold judicial inquiries into breaches in dykes and the probes were under way. 

Double Standard of Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry


The Supreme Court has made public the verdict in petition filed by Kh. Haris against appointment of Mr. Irfan Qadir as Prosecutor General, NAB. The decision is in favour of the petitioner and Mr. Irfan Qadir has lost his job. The SC acted swiftly to decide a legal matter about a clause in NAB Ordinance.
Let us see what actually is the law in this regard? The prosecutor General of The NAB is to be appointed for a period of three years (un-extendible). Mr. Irfan Qadir had completed a term of three years during previous regime. This time he had been given the job anew. It had nothing to do with the previous tenure. But the great interpreters of the laws have decided as if it were an extension.
Now let us take another case. It relates to a constitutional matter. According to article 179 of the Constitution of Pakistan which reads, “A judge of the Supreme Court shall hold office until he attains the age of sixty five years, unless he sooner resigns or is removed from office in accordance with the Constitution.”

What Iftikhar Chaudhry Wants?


Enough is enough. It was former general Musharraf, who dislodged the Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry from the supreme court, and it was the same Musharraf who took oath from him earlier. It was the fight between Musharraf and Iftikhar, but I am at loss as why Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry is hell bent against on the PPP government, especially he is not sparing the president Asif Ali Zardari?
Why not CJP Iftikhar Chuahdry takes suo moto action against Musharraf and order investigation in the assets of Musharraf? Why doesnt he start proceedings to bring the Musharraf back to Pakistan? Why doesn’t he presses the cases of missing persons and the drone attacks, and the terrorism, and the corruption of Sharif brothers?
Why only PPP?
General Irfan Qadir’s reported refusal to abide by the Supreme Court’s judgment regarding his (Qadir’s) removal from office, is justified. It’s not the task of CJP. Its the task of government and head of the state.
So where all those people who restored the judiciary to see it locking horns with the democratic government?
@Souces

PM's role cannot be minimised: CJ

PM's role cannot be minimised: CJ
ISLAMABAD – Article 175-A does not abrogate or diminish the independence of judiciary, said the counsel for civil society groups on Tuesday while arguing his case before a 17-member bench of the Supreme Court which is hearing identical petitions challenging the various clauses of the 18th Amendment, particularly the formation of Judicial Commission and Parliamentary Committee for the appointment of judges in superior courts.
Salman Akram Raja said that independence of judiciary was a salient feature of the Constitution and was the foundation for the overall structure of the constitution. He said the fundamental importance to this structure is the judiciary’s power of judicial review, particularly in the context of the enforcement of fundamental rights and for the purpose of giving effect to the separation of powers between the different federating units as well as the three great organs of the state - legislature, judiciary and executive. Judicial review as envisaged by the constitution necessarily mandates the independence of the judiciary.
Designed and Developed By Amir Sayani